you're reading...

Featured

When mandatory arbitration replaces litigation, consumers lose

WASHINGTON, June 16, 2013 – Legislation that would eliminate required arbitration for employee, consumer and civil rights disputes was proposed last month. It should be passed.  Congress must act to restore fairness.

Big business and corporate money, along with a corporate friendly Supreme Court, have been enough in the past to defeat efforts to bring fairness back to the arena of routine consumer and employee rights. Unfortunately, the same thing is likely to happen again, and the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2013 that has been introduced in the House (and a similar bill in the Senate) will likely fail.

Read more

Follow Us

FacebookTwitterOur YouTube Channel

  • A Maricopa County judge ordered the county and Arizona Diamondbacks to take their bitter fight into mediation. ,
  • For what’s thought to be the first time, Douglas County District Court is trying to work out a criminal… ,
  • Plaintiff Robert Piveronas and Sodexo, Inc. agreed to stay in the case pending the outcome of a scheduled mediation. ,
  • As the lease mandated as the first step in resolving differences, Judge Karen Mullins ordered the two si… ,
  • Frontier Airlines is actively involved with the negotiations taking place under the guidance of the National Mediat… ,
  • Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf says the city is planning to file for an impasse and seek in negotiations wit… ,

For Online Family Mediation:


For Workplace Mediation


Workplace Mediation